First off I contend time does not exist in the natural state of the universe. Rather it's a way of measurement for humans to express differences between bundles of energy that have coalesced. This with the understanding so-called objects are nothing more then energy which became bundled
Even when energy forms separate objects doesn't prove time actually exist. Several objects could be perfectly content with no need to rely on time for their substance even if they moved about.
Time only comes into play if our consciousness wishes to measure such actions. In other words time is nothing more then a measurement we created so we may make some sort of sense in our limited intellectual capacity.
Reasoning time has no existence, there's only the instantaneous now in all it's many forms. We're just not capable of comprehending it.
What are your thoughts?
Check back often. Better yet subscribe. You never know what you'll find next on this blog. Entertainment, science, technology, humor, everything in between and more.
I didn't want to make my post too long. So instead I assume you're coming here because you have greater interest. That said, here's an expanded thought.
ReplyDeleteSuppose we observe light coming here from some distant sun 13 billion light years away from our perspective. According to theories light traveling at that speed seems like less then only a fraction of second has past. Nearly no "time" at all. Essentially zero time. As for the star itself. Time as it would see us on Earth is some 13 billion lights years away as well. Both would assume the other is 13 billion light years (non existent time as measured) from the other.
This while in truth the observable could be far different from what reality exist. Why couldn't both exist at the same instant? What if it were so? Quantum physics tells us it might be possible.