See: Rebels with a cause rally to save Wehr's Dam
Proponents who support removal of the Jordan Creek's Wehr Dam in South Whitehall Township argue that warmer less oxygenated water behind the dam is a determent to fish. They also argue it prevents fish from traveling freely upstream and down.
That may be a valid argument under normal weather conditions. However...
Removal of this dam would serve to exasperate the problem fish already have when trying to survive under these conditions when they occur. If you will note in the first article it said, "..anglers rescued fish trapped in small pools of water." Let it be said crappy water is better then no water at all. At least fish stand a chance of being rescued.
According to a U.S. Geological Survey published in 1968 "Jordan Creek has been dry during part of the Summer or Fall in at least 15 of the last 32 years." The full U.S. Geological Survey pdf file can also be found HERE. Search for Jordan Creek. WARNING: The File Is Large
This is why I've stated time and again ya might get away with dam removals on other creeks and rivers, but not Wehr's dam on the Jordan Creek. It doesn't have near the consistent water flow of these others.
There's not a doubt in my mind by removing this dam, from time to time instead of picnickers enjoying the dam they will be looking over a dried creek bed along with the smell of rotting fish.
That is if fish can even exist in the creek if the dam should be removed.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are under moderation. Meaning pending approval. If comments are disrespectful or do not address this specific topic they will not be published