The Most Brazen Corporate Power Grab in American History By Chris Hedges / Truthdig (11/6/2015)
My Comments About The Articles Above
As if this international agreement weren't bad enough I find it appalling it forces within 3 years state and local governments to comply and "ban “Buy America” or buy local preferences" as well.
This Sucks Worse Then You May Think Suppose Pennsylvania were to have set up Allentown's NIZ zone three years from now instead of when it did. At that time it would be illegal for the ANIZDA or developers to reject foreign manufactured building materials. So too rejecting foreign held corporations competing on American soil. Thus forcing ANIZDA to consider them for the project along with their right to bring in an unlimited number of "skilled workers" holding H1-B VISAs.
This agreement also means whichever President we choose in the next election will have his or her hands completely tied no matter how America votes.
Folks we heard about the day the world's wealthy would one day take over the world and it's governments (federal, state & local). With this one great big and final push it looks like that day is just around the corner.
(1) It's pathetic 'Russian TV' presented this on one of their programs. It speaks volumes when the three major corporate controlled cable news outlets withheld this information or chose not to air it The key words here are "corporate controlled". This is why the internet is so important today. It's become the guardian of Democracy over what newspapers/TV were once meant to protect by investigating and reporting on those who'd weaken or destroy our country's way of life.
(2) 90% who will visit this post in the days ahead will not spend the time to either read or watch the videos. In short most people don't give a rats ass. Other then the remaining 10% who will spend more then a minute after clicking here, these kind of posts are irrelevant. However those 90% will be the first to bitch and moan when it hits home being unaware of how and why this stuff happens. I am aware of this via my 'statcounter' statistics and comments left elsewhere. This doesn't mean I will not direct future posts to those who so few still care.
(3) Participation: Still astounds me how 100's of comments are left elsewhere over far less concerns. The vast majority of those who comment in social media are anonymous as myself. I have yet to figure out why a name attached to a blog, comment or news publisher means they have any more insight or influence over situations then I or anyone else. Social media is suppose to engage one another in thoughts and issues. Not so much who somebody is or what power others think they may hold power over changing things. But hey, if people want to shoot off their mouths anonymously thinking themselves to have more importance rather then the issues I or other present... whom am I to disagree?
That's the way I look at things.
BTW: I'm certain only 1 in 20 or so will bother clicking to this comment If you're one of them... consider yourself special :-)
All comments are under moderation. Meaning pending approval. If comments are disrespectful or do not address this specific topic they will not be published
Thoughts In Addendum:
ReplyDelete(1) It's pathetic 'Russian TV' presented this on one of their programs. It speaks volumes when the three major corporate controlled cable news outlets withheld this information or chose not to air it The key words here are "corporate controlled". This is why the internet is so important today. It's become the guardian of Democracy over what newspapers/TV were once meant to protect by investigating and reporting on those who'd weaken or destroy our country's way of life.
(2) 90% who will visit this post in the days ahead will not spend the time to either read or watch the videos. In short most people don't give a rats ass. Other then the remaining 10% who will spend more then a minute after clicking here, these kind of posts are irrelevant. However those 90% will be the first to bitch and moan when it hits home being unaware of how and why this stuff happens. I am aware of this via my 'statcounter' statistics and comments left elsewhere. This doesn't mean I will not direct future posts to those who so few still care.
(3) Participation:
Still astounds me how 100's of comments are left elsewhere over far less concerns. The vast majority of those who comment in social media are anonymous as myself. I have yet to figure out why a name attached to a blog, comment or news publisher means they have any more insight or influence over situations then I or anyone else. Social media is suppose to engage one another in thoughts and issues. Not so much who somebody is or what power others think they may hold power over changing things. But hey, if people want to shoot off their mouths anonymously thinking themselves to have more importance rather then the issues I or other present... whom am I to disagree?
That's the way I look at things.
BTW: I'm certain only 1 in 20 or so will bother clicking to this comment
If you're one of them... consider yourself special :-)