I don't really mean to. I absolutely don't favor one party over the other. Rather I'm absolutely committed to common sense values and the things I strongly believe in. I myself personally don't associate my beliefs with either party.
I will now list a few of my thoughts and leave it for others to decide whether I'm Red or Blue. Something I abhor because nothing in this life is either that black or white when it comes to either party. Although most of my beliefs align somewhat with liberal ideology when it comes to words versus actions the Democratic party is as full of shit as anybodyThese are only a few of my beliefs and concerns. Now if you think I'm a supporter of either Democrats or Republicans that's your problem.
I will go with either party that most likely will align with my way of thinking. Right now from all indications the Democrats are not a party to be followed blindly, but Republicans sure as hell seem to stand for all the things I'm most against. If you care little about the environment, social security's stability, reasonable healthcare for all Americans (no matter how imperfect Obamacare is), reigning in out of control corporations, food regulations, environmental threats or generally speaking letting the government take a hands off policy... then the Republican party is for you.
Don't get me wrong Democrats (when it comes tick for tac) are little better, but when it comes to a outright supporting a free for all government looking out for itself and the rich/powerful, Republicans tend to come down on that side of the fence.
There are no heroes in either party in my book. Both are self serving. I guess you could say I'm loyal to neither party nor a government that doesn't place it's peoples' interests before it's own. Historically speaking I'm not sure that's ever happened nor happening today. If some still want to label me in some way.. screw ya. I don't care what one thinks. I'm about more in my ideology then being categorized and being defined in some way by someone who won't discuss or refine one of the things I stated above.
Failing to communicate with me elaborating your differences on my these views speaks more about your prejudices then it does about me. So-Be-It.
Sunday, June 8, 2014
Texas: Being Gay Is A Matter Of Choice
Let's Make Friday Switcheroo Day
So OK, who wants to go first?
:)
Saturday, June 7, 2014
Allentown Homeless Be Shelterless This Winter?
Rev. Richard Baumann is resigning from Allentown's St. Paul's Lutheran Church over differences with the congregation. He indicated they had differences over the way he did his "community-based ministry". No doubt the biggest bugaboo was his staunch support of the church's homeless shelter during the winter months called 'Safe Haven'. Critics didn't like the way it was run.
One thing can be said however. No one was turned away. That may not be the case this winter if 'Safe Haven' no longer exist. You see there are those who believe either you run things the right way or not at all. Here's the problem with that. "Not at all" is not an acceptable option for the 275 homeless who had no place other to go in the cold last winter (2013-2014).
Doing things the "right way" could end up costing as much as five times more then Rev. Baumann did it for. Critics may complain about overcrowding, having to sleep on floors or having little to no supervision, but hell at least they were indoors. Something that won't happen for these 275+ homeless if "doing things the right way" can't get the funding they estimated will be needed.
So the question boils down to this that only the homeless should answer. Would they rather have what some call a crappy place to sleep indoors. Or few to none, if sponsors can't find the needed funding? This could leave many more of them to fend for themselves then last year.
Under Rev Baumann's ministry St. Paul's adapted to the needs of the poor and minorities in center city Allentown. St. Paul's is the last of the grand a glorious churches that were among several in downtown Allentown in it's better days. It didn't shutdown shop or move to the suburbs like several other churches which abandoned downtown Allentown seeking a more lucrative congregation.
I'm not sure what direction this church intends to go, but with the news of Rev. Richard Baumann resignation it doesn't bode well for Allentown's most vulnerable. I certainly have no way of knowing if this is their intent but perhaps the congregation wants to gentrify itself with a bit of the new promised wealth the NIZ is expected to bring downtown, eh? Time will tell. We shall see.. shalln't we?
Kind of a no brainer question...
What would Jesus want them to do?
Red Sovine- "If Jesus Came To Your House"
UPDATED
(10/07/2014)
WFMZ is reporting, "A homeless shelter that can accommodate at least 50 people will open in the middle of Allentown on Nov. 1"
One thing can be said however. No one was turned away. That may not be the case this winter if 'Safe Haven' no longer exist. You see there are those who believe either you run things the right way or not at all. Here's the problem with that. "Not at all" is not an acceptable option for the 275 homeless who had no place other to go in the cold last winter (2013-2014).
Doing things the "right way" could end up costing as much as five times more then Rev. Baumann did it for. Critics may complain about overcrowding, having to sleep on floors or having little to no supervision, but hell at least they were indoors. Something that won't happen for these 275+ homeless if "doing things the right way" can't get the funding they estimated will be needed.
So the question boils down to this that only the homeless should answer. Would they rather have what some call a crappy place to sleep indoors. Or few to none, if sponsors can't find the needed funding? This could leave many more of them to fend for themselves then last year.
Under Rev Baumann's ministry St. Paul's adapted to the needs of the poor and minorities in center city Allentown. St. Paul's is the last of the grand a glorious churches that were among several in downtown Allentown in it's better days. It didn't shutdown shop or move to the suburbs like several other churches which abandoned downtown Allentown seeking a more lucrative congregation.
I'm not sure what direction this church intends to go, but with the news of Rev. Richard Baumann resignation it doesn't bode well for Allentown's most vulnerable. I certainly have no way of knowing if this is their intent but perhaps the congregation wants to gentrify itself with a bit of the new promised wealth the NIZ is expected to bring downtown, eh? Time will tell. We shall see.. shalln't we?
What would Jesus want them to do?
Red Sovine- "If Jesus Came To Your House"
(10/07/2014)
WFMZ is reporting, "A homeless shelter that can accommodate at least 50 people will open in the middle of Allentown on Nov. 1"
Friday, June 6, 2014
FOX News Believes In Public Hangings
FOX news has really gone to town on Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl and his father. Anyone who has ever done jury duty has probably been convinced 100% a person is guilty after the prosecution attorney spoke. That is until defense introduced counter arguments. Such is not the case when FOX conducts it's trial by public execution of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl.
I don't know about you, but I would say and do what ever it would take necessary to keep myself alive if held captive. There's no point in being a dead hero just to appease a few assholes at FOX news. You see in this country we are suppose to be allowed (by trial) to explain ourselves.
FOX news has interviewed a bunch of unverified supposed ex-soldiers comrades who were assumed to part of his infantry unit, but not all were actually part of his platoon. A bunch of guys who only had second hand gossip-like information. What FOX news is doing is giving Bergdahl a unfair grilling before they hang him by a bunch of couch potatoes who have no first hand knowledge.
I said it before and I will say it again, FOX News is more dangerous then 'Tokyo Rose', Nazi or the Russian propaganda news organizations could have ever been to undermine America and it's president. They've already tried and hung Bergdah in the court of public opinion before having heard his or is father's side.
Aside from that, regarding the release of Taliban prisoners.. How many Taliban fighters were involved in 911?
NONE!!!
Yes the Taliban are asshole terrorists, but only a threat to the Afghan people. Their interests lie within Afghanistan. Not the USA. And yes these were the same idiots the United States supplied with weapons and support to fight the Russians when they occupied Afghanistan. in armed conflict. If these 5 prisoners released are a threat to Americans, it is only to those American soldiers who still occupy Afghanistan.
FOX News (via Megan Kelly, Fox & Friends and Sean Hannity) have placed both he, his family and supporters in danger (the likes of public lynching) who now have come under death threats.
I don't know whether Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl is a victim of innocence or guilt, but apparently FOX News has appointed themselves the judge and jury which could result in some nut job executing either or both him and his father for the things they have said taken out of context.
I surely don't know all the facts, but that sure as hell didn't stop FOX News. This isn't a game. There are real people and their lives are involved. If anything happens FOX News should be held fully accountable to not only the family but what damage they have caused internationally between the United States and the foreign relations between the two countries.
None of the FOX News mouthpieces have been appointed nor elected to speak for either the United States, our state department nor the Afghan people. I don't know who the hell they think they are, but they need to shut the hell up and confine themselves to report only on those that have first hand knowledge and are directly involved. Appointing themselves judge and jury is beyond disingenuous, it's downright despicable if not (at the least) undermining everything the country stands for.
I don't know about you, but I would say and do what ever it would take necessary to keep myself alive if held captive. There's no point in being a dead hero just to appease a few assholes at FOX news. You see in this country we are suppose to be allowed (by trial) to explain ourselves.
FOX news has interviewed a bunch of unverified supposed ex-soldiers comrades who were assumed to part of his infantry unit, but not all were actually part of his platoon. A bunch of guys who only had second hand gossip-like information. What FOX news is doing is giving Bergdahl a unfair grilling before they hang him by a bunch of couch potatoes who have no first hand knowledge.
I said it before and I will say it again, FOX News is more dangerous then 'Tokyo Rose', Nazi or the Russian propaganda news organizations could have ever been to undermine America and it's president. They've already tried and hung Bergdah in the court of public opinion before having heard his or is father's side.
Aside from that, regarding the release of Taliban prisoners.. How many Taliban fighters were involved in 911?
NONE!!!
Yes the Taliban are asshole terrorists, but only a threat to the Afghan people. Their interests lie within Afghanistan. Not the USA. And yes these were the same idiots the United States supplied with weapons and support to fight the Russians when they occupied Afghanistan. in armed conflict. If these 5 prisoners released are a threat to Americans, it is only to those American soldiers who still occupy Afghanistan.
FOX News (via Megan Kelly, Fox & Friends and Sean Hannity) have placed both he, his family and supporters in danger (the likes of public lynching) who now have come under death threats.
I don't know whether Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl is a victim of innocence or guilt, but apparently FOX News has appointed themselves the judge and jury which could result in some nut job executing either or both him and his father for the things they have said taken out of context.
I surely don't know all the facts, but that sure as hell didn't stop FOX News. This isn't a game. There are real people and their lives are involved. If anything happens FOX News should be held fully accountable to not only the family but what damage they have caused internationally between the United States and the foreign relations between the two countries.
None of the FOX News mouthpieces have been appointed nor elected to speak for either the United States, our state department nor the Afghan people. I don't know who the hell they think they are, but they need to shut the hell up and confine themselves to report only on those that have first hand knowledge and are directly involved. Appointing themselves judge and jury is beyond disingenuous, it's downright despicable if not (at the least) undermining everything the country stands for.
Guns, Guns And More Guns
Idiots from the NRA and other gun supporters would have us believe the more guns there are, the better.
Well I decided to Google just the shootings that took place over this past week alone. I gave up. There were far too many to list. Here's only a few!!!The United States Is Gun Nuts!
Not only should we change the way guns are regulated but we should rewrite the constitution. Here's why...
When the constitution was written it was intended that guns be used to form a "well regulated militia". I don't give a flying fig what the supreme court says.. they are wrong. If the supreme court screwed this up then legislators (and we) need to re-write the 2nd amendment clarifying and improving on this 200 year old doctrine as soon as possible!
It might have been fine 200 years ago, but it is now outdated. At the time, gun owners had to take gunpowder out of a horn. Then measure and pack it. Then load a shot into the barrel using a ramrod. Finally one had to make sure they had working flint to fire their weapon. All of this took time and there were many that misfired. Today's (unmodified) semi-automatic guns can fire at least 10 rounds from a clip in far less time then a minute. In fact another multi round clip can be fired and reloaded several times less then it would take just one lead shot in those days a long time ago when the constitution was written. This is why soldiers used bayonets way back then. The best they could hope for (if they were lucky) was to get one poorly aimed shot against their enemy.
It simply astounds me that here in the United States we scream, holler, spend billions of dollars and are paranoid over foreign terrorists, when in all likelihood we more likely to get killed by a homeowner, gang member, trigger happy cop, jealous lover, a pissed off neighbor or some unstable individual getting a hold of a gun because of a outdated 200 year old doctrine.
Am I supposed to feel safer when a bunch of ass clowns walk into a store toting guns OR a paranoid gun toting angry individual (or cop) feels threatened, offended or misinterpreted something I said or done?
WELL.. I DON'T
The more guns out there,
the more likely someone's going to get shot dead...
PERIOD!
Well I decided to Google just the shootings that took place over this past week alone. I gave up. There were far too many to list. Here's only a few!!!
Not only should we change the way guns are regulated but we should rewrite the constitution. Here's why...
When the constitution was written it was intended that guns be used to form a "well regulated militia". I don't give a flying fig what the supreme court says.. they are wrong. If the supreme court screwed this up then legislators (and we) need to re-write the 2nd amendment clarifying and improving on this 200 year old doctrine as soon as possible!
It might have been fine 200 years ago, but it is now outdated. At the time, gun owners had to take gunpowder out of a horn. Then measure and pack it. Then load a shot into the barrel using a ramrod. Finally one had to make sure they had working flint to fire their weapon. All of this took time and there were many that misfired. Today's (unmodified) semi-automatic guns can fire at least 10 rounds from a clip in far less time then a minute. In fact another multi round clip can be fired and reloaded several times less then it would take just one lead shot in those days a long time ago when the constitution was written. This is why soldiers used bayonets way back then. The best they could hope for (if they were lucky) was to get one poorly aimed shot against their enemy.
It simply astounds me that here in the United States we scream, holler, spend billions of dollars and are paranoid over foreign terrorists, when in all likelihood we more likely to get killed by a homeowner, gang member, trigger happy cop, jealous lover, a pissed off neighbor or some unstable individual getting a hold of a gun because of a outdated 200 year old doctrine.
Am I supposed to feel safer when a bunch of ass clowns walk into a store toting guns OR a paranoid gun toting angry individual (or cop) feels threatened, offended or misinterpreted something I said or done?
WELL.. I DON'T
The more guns out there,
the more likely someone's going to get shot dead...
PERIOD!
Tuesday, June 3, 2014
Forbes: Obama EPA Issues Coal-Killing Rules
FORBES: Obama EPA Issues Coal-Killing Rules To Cut Carbon Emissions 30 Percent
COMMENTARY Conservative Republicans in Congress went bonkers when they heard this and are planning future legislation to block it. First off when do we reach the point of no return tipping point on global warming and become like the planet Venus?
The Earth's lungs are it's greenery. Earth's vegetation absorbs CO2 (green house gases). Someone may say well we'll just plant a bunch of trees if the Earth's climate reaches that tipping point. WRONG. Droughts and extended heating and bitter cold conditions would kill off the trees and other vegetation (including the food we eat). In short we'd be screwed. The time to act is now.
Others call bullshit on global warming (fools that they are). Climatologists aren't religious leaders. They aren't politicians. Neither are they invested in the fossil fuel industry. So why would anyone take the word of those who have selfishly everything to gain with their denials over scientific proof that says otherwise when it comes to the continued burning of fossil fuels?
Still there are other conservatives lashing out about how carbon reduction regulation will kill jobs. Hey jackass... how many ships today are hiring sail riggers? How many firemen are still shoveling coal down in the boiler rooms of cruise and cargo ships or on rail locomotives? None you say! Yeah they moved on to the next technology. That's how things work out. Should the USA have continued to stagnate while the world moved on just to save jobs? Wouldn't that be stupid!
Yeah I have empathy for coal miners, oil drillers and their families, but only an imbecile would encourage workers to risk their lives when it's no longer necessary. Only fools would place the value of gold over scientific progress and the perpetuation of the human race.
Hey I and my offspring got to live here too. Given the right balance, CO2 keeps us from cooking or freezing to death. This isn't a religious principle or a political belief.. it's scientific fact.
If the Earth were to get too cold we know that we could easily introduce to CO2 to the atmosphere (by burning fossil fuels) to avoid another ice age by trapping heat. However once Earth's climate goes too far the other way we can't simply plant vegetation to reverse droughts and extreme heat that would prevent plant growth.
WHAT'S SO FREAKING HARD TO UNDERSTAND !
The Earth's lungs are it's greenery. Earth's vegetation absorbs CO2 (green house gases). Someone may say well we'll just plant a bunch of trees if the Earth's climate reaches that tipping point. WRONG. Droughts and extended heating and bitter cold conditions would kill off the trees and other vegetation (including the food we eat). In short we'd be screwed. The time to act is now.
Others call bullshit on global warming (fools that they are). Climatologists aren't religious leaders. They aren't politicians. Neither are they invested in the fossil fuel industry. So why would anyone take the word of those who have selfishly everything to gain with their denials over scientific proof that says otherwise when it comes to the continued burning of fossil fuels?
Still there are other conservatives lashing out about how carbon reduction regulation will kill jobs. Hey jackass... how many ships today are hiring sail riggers? How many firemen are still shoveling coal down in the boiler rooms of cruise and cargo ships or on rail locomotives? None you say! Yeah they moved on to the next technology. That's how things work out. Should the USA have continued to stagnate while the world moved on just to save jobs? Wouldn't that be stupid!
Yeah I have empathy for coal miners, oil drillers and their families, but only an imbecile would encourage workers to risk their lives when it's no longer necessary. Only fools would place the value of gold over scientific progress and the perpetuation of the human race.
Hey I and my offspring got to live here too. Given the right balance, CO2 keeps us from cooking or freezing to death. This isn't a religious principle or a political belief.. it's scientific fact.
If the Earth were to get too cold we know that we could easily introduce to CO2 to the atmosphere (by burning fossil fuels) to avoid another ice age by trapping heat. However once Earth's climate goes too far the other way we can't simply plant vegetation to reverse droughts and extreme heat that would prevent plant growth.
WHAT'S SO FREAKING HARD TO UNDERSTAND !
Best Campaign Strategy For Democrats
Over the last few days the Secretary for the VA resigned. So did Whitehouse spokesman Jay Carney. . Here's an idea...Give em' what they want!
I suggest Barack Obama resign along with Joe Biden. That would leave John Boehner (speaker of the House) in charge. Can you only imagine what would happen!
That would leave Republicans with about a year and a half to show the country what they're made of. Wouldn't that be a hoot!
Call it a preview of how Republicans would handle things. I figure it this way, how bad could Boehner screw things up in a year and a half?
Remember the Democrats control the Senate and could keep him in check. See how it goes when the shoe's on the other foot.
Imagine how John Boehner's attitude would change after he was briefed on security, economic and other issues that only the President is privy to. It's one thing to shoot off your mouth on FOX news and as a congressional member on the sidelines. It's entirely another matter when your they guy sitting behind the desk in the oval office. The guy that's held accountable for every thing that 2,724,000 federal employees may say or do. Hell's sake, you'd have to have an all seeing eye!
Damn, I'd give a month's of my income just to watch President John Boehner run the country till the 2016 elections. It would be so worth it to give up power for just 1.5 years already knowing that it would be Boehner's worst nightmare. It also would be a great way for putting a cork on Boehner cockiness.
Ted Cruz you're next!
I suggest Barack Obama resign along with Joe Biden. That would leave John Boehner (speaker of the House) in charge. Can you only imagine what would happen!
That would leave Republicans with about a year and a half to show the country what they're made of. Wouldn't that be a hoot!
Call it a preview of how Republicans would handle things. I figure it this way, how bad could Boehner screw things up in a year and a half?
Remember the Democrats control the Senate and could keep him in check. See how it goes when the shoe's on the other foot.
Imagine how John Boehner's attitude would change after he was briefed on security, economic and other issues that only the President is privy to. It's one thing to shoot off your mouth on FOX news and as a congressional member on the sidelines. It's entirely another matter when your they guy sitting behind the desk in the oval office. The guy that's held accountable for every thing that 2,724,000 federal employees may say or do. Hell's sake, you'd have to have an all seeing eye!
Damn, I'd give a month's of my income just to watch President John Boehner run the country till the 2016 elections. It would be so worth it to give up power for just 1.5 years already knowing that it would be Boehner's worst nightmare. It also would be a great way for putting a cork on Boehner cockiness.
Ted Cruz you're next!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)